November 10, 2016
In looking over the election's various post-mortems, it was made clear that the loser had the substantial support of black, hispanic and Asian minority voters to whom she reached out often and openly. It's not a crime to do that as all will agree.
It was also made clear that the winner had the substantial support of white voters to whom it was alleged he reached out often and openly.
That, however, appears to be some sort of crime to the MSM pundits who universally alleged such to be racist and bigoted conduct on his part.
And yet they wonder why few trust in their judgment?