T H E  N A T I O N A L  S P E C T R U M

A M E R I C A ' S  D O T  C O M M E N T A R Y©


February 1, 2017


          Look to the right - notice my photograph? I am the quintessential white male in appearance. I speak fluent American English, have an American passport, California driver's license and an ID card from the California State Bar Association. Nonetheless, should I fly 125 miles from home in Los Angeles to San Diego, I am extremely vetted in both directions. Off come my coat, jacket, sweater, shoes and belt. My laptop must be in view in a plastic bucket, along with the contents of my pockets. My carry-on bag is individually examined and I am made to stand in a screening device so that a government employee may look at my body, genitals and all. A government employee examines and investigates these things before I can begin to head to my flight's gate. The same ritual is imposed when I return home. And I'm an unmistakable Anglo-Saxon American.

          This routine is played out millions of times each DAY in the United States and all U.S citizens who  fly are subjected to it. Except, of course, people like Schmuckie Schumer and those other politicians who exempt themselves from rules which they force you and me to obey. They never suffer the groping and prying indignities of us nobodies. They are the power elites. Also exempted are the well-to-do flying in their own planes and the famous who go through special doors to avoid these rituals.

          God forbid we should expect Muslims or other alien visitors to undergo similar vetting. That's some sort of bar to religious freedom and, of course, not who we are at least according to Schmukie and his fellow-travelers. Somewhere, according to Nancy Pelousi, the statue of Liberty is crying to which I add her tears are from laughter not sadness.




January 30, 2017


          The recent executive order ban on certain visa holders raised the presstitutes hackles no end. The "Not who we are" trope invariably followed by a cite from the Lazarus sonnet were the support for the condemnation of the President.

          "A Muslim ban"; a "religious litmus test" were typical statements except, as usual, the 27-year old know-nothings of the 4th estate were wrong. For example, the various restrictions were NOT imposed on countries with very large Muslim populations: India, Indonesia (where Obama learned to be a muslim), Egypt and many more. Thus, the Muslim ban cannot be true.

          Those 7 countries names were, in fact, named by Obama in 2015 and in the same context of being terrorist threats.

          Also overlooked was the fact that Obama imposed the same ban on Iraqis. It's overlooked as the presstitutes are still covering Obama's black ass as they did at the time. Not an ounce of liberal criticism came from the media mouth as it never does when democrats do it.

          These utterances are first lies as they are selectively true and, thus, fake news by definition.

          These dumbbells don't yet know they are being played by a shrewd President as they were played by a shrewd candidate. It's sometimes known as "The Art of the Deal".



January 30, 2017


         Until yesterday, I'd never heard of Cornell Brooks who, it turns out, is the president of the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Of course, they really mean black people as brown, yellow, red and white skinned people are deemed not to be colored. Black, it seems to me, is the absence of color but let that go for the moment. Any sentient American knows full well that the NAACP is a racist group of blacks who push solely for black people and all to the pushers political, personal and profitable benefit. If you were to launch the National Association for White People, the NAACP would be over you like flies on feces.

             Mr. Brooks' complaint is that the President's intention to investigate voter fraud is really a presidential plan to suppress black voters though he characterizes that as minority voters. In fact, everybody is a minority of some kind depending on how once chooses to slice the American pie. Brooks threatens to resist any attempt to investigate voter fraud because, he says, there is no voter fraud. Brooks omits any basis for his conclusion.

          Think about what Brooks is saying. He knows, based on no offered evidence, there is no voter fraud so the President or the Congress or whichever agency of the federal government is charged with the task is to be resisted massively. And his basis for resistance is that any investigation for voter fraud is really a way to suppress black voters.

          Brooks cannot be a stupid man but his logic is impeccably stupid. His conclusion is so stupid that it cannot be true, it must be false and, because he's not personally stupid, it must be knowingly and intentionally false. It plays well in the fake news press and with the NAACP's donor group. That's why I call it and Brooks frauds. Why not have an investigation to prove Brook's point? Because Brooks knows that there is voter fraud out there and he knows where it is and who commits it as well.

          And that's why Brooks, Democrats and their ilk don't even want to investigate whether there is or isn't voter fraud or its extent. They are afraid, simply afraid to have voter fraud exposed for what it is, who it benefits and who commits and supports it. It is just obvious. All you need do is notice.




January 22, 2017


           The Main Stream Media missed it again. Why those people get bucks and perks is beyond me. Most of them, especially the big name dudes and dudettes, missed the primary and the election and now they missed totally what the President really said in his inauguration speech on January 20th. What Trump did was so refreshing and politically revolutionary that the mainstreamers missed it totally. Most of the presstitutes said the speech, intended for the Trump base but failing to reach out to the Clinton voters in an attempt to unify the nation.

           The President did something better than that: he spoke to his listeners, all his listeners, as Americans. He did not speak to some listeners as a racial minority, queers, transgenders, men or women or in any category other than the one that truly counts: Americans. 

           The President did not pander to groups; he did not try to divide the country into political blocs to be purchased or manipulated. He did just the opposite. The President literally spoke to all of us Americans, not as splinter groups of any kind. Marvelous to behold indeed.

             Thank you Mr. President for your respecting us for what we truly are: Americans. One of a kind.

jim sweeney

Jim Sweeney




Blog Archive